MARTIN V. HUNTER'S LESSEE
You don't have access to this content. Please try to log in with your institution. Sign In
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816), a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in the development of federal-state relations, asserted for the first time the Supreme Court's authority under Section 25 of the federal Judiciary Act of 1789 to hear appellate state supreme court cases involving the constitutionality of federal laws or treaties. Martin's origins lay in 300,000 acres of land in Virginia's "Northern Neck" region, which Charles II of England had granted to the Fairfax family in 1649. In 1776, when the American colonies declared independence from Britain, many colonists—including Thomas Fairfax, the sixth Lord Fairfax—remained loyal to Britain. From 1779 to 1785, however, Virginia's legislature passed several acts confiscating Loyalist-owned lands. When Fairfax died in 1781, he willed his property to his nephew, Denny Martin. The following year, however, Virginia legislators passed an act arguing that Martin, a foreign national, could not inherit property in the Old Dominion. Virginia took formal possession of the Fairfax estate and granted it to private citizens, such as David Hunter, who received 788 acres. To complicate matters, John Marshall, who would become chief justice of the United States, successfully represented Martin's land claims in Hite v. Fairfax (1786). The Fairfax litigation may have led Martin to sell 160,000 acres to a Virginia land speculators cartel that included John and James Marshall.
Contents
- MARBURY V. MADISON
- MARTIN V. HUNTER'S LESSEE
- TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE V. WOODWARD
- McCULLOCH V. MARYLAND
- COHENS V. VIRGINIA
- GIBBONS V. OGDEN
- WORCESTER V. GEORGIA
- CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE V. WARREN BRIDGE
- UNITED STATES V. AMISTAD
- PRIGG V. PENNSYLVANIA
- DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD
- ABLEMAN V. BOOTH
- EX PARTE MILLIGAN
- SLAUGHTERHOUSE CASES
- UNITED STATES V. CRUIKSHANK
- REYNOLDS V. UNITED STATES
- CIVIL RIGHTS CASES
- ELK V. WILKINS
- PLESSY V. FERGUSON
- UNITED STATES V. WONG KIM ARK
- LOCHNER V. NEW YORK
- MULLER V. OREGON
- FRANK V. MANGUM
- GUINN V. UNITED STATES
- HAMMER V. DAGENHART
- SCHENCK V. UNITED STATES
- ABRAMS V. UNITED STATES
- WHITNEY V. CALIFORNIA
- OLMSTEAD V. UNITED STATES
- POWELL V. ALABAMA
- A.L.A. SCHECHTER POULTRY CORPORATION V. UNITED STATES
- UNITED STATES V. CURTISS-WRIGHT
- NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORPORATION
- WEST COAST HOTEL V. PARRISH
- CANTWELL V. CONNECTICUT
- WICKARD V. FILBURN
- WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION V. BARNETTE
- KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES
- SWEATT V. PAINTER
- DENNIS V. UNITED STATES
- YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE CO. V. SAWYER
- BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
- HERNANDEZ V. TEXAS
- GOMILLION V. LIGHTFOOT
- MAPP V. OHIO
- BAKER V. CARR
- ENGEL V. VITALE
- GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT
- KATZENBACH v. McCLUNG
- NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. SULLIVAN
- GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT
- BOND V. FLOYD
- MIRANDA V. ARIZONA
- SOUTH CAROLINA V. KATZENBACH
- LOVING v. VIRGINIA
- TINKER V. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
- NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. UNITED STATES
- FLOOD V. KUHN
- FURMAN V. GEORGIA
- SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT V. RODRIGUEZ
- SIERRA CLUB V. MORTON
- ROE V. WADE
- MILLIKEN V. BRADLEY
- UNITED STATES V. NIXON
- CRAIG V. BOREN
- REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. BAKKE
- FRONTIERO v. RICHARDSON
- TEXAS V. JOHNSON
- UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ
- UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA
- CLINTON V. JONES
- BUSH V. GORE
- FRIENDS OF THE EARTH V. LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
- ZELMAN V. SIMMONS-HARRIS
- LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
- DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER
- CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
- SHELBY COUNTY V. HOLDER
- OBERGEFELL V. HODGES
- BOSTOCK V. CLAYTON COUNTY
- DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION