WORCESTER V. GEORGIA
You don't have access to this content. Please try to log in with your institution. Sign In
Samuel A. Worcester was a prominent American missionary and publisher who saw the infringement of American settlement in the state of Georgia as a direct threat to the sovereignty of the Cherokee people. Worcester was one of roughly a dozen missionaries who wished to protest a Georgia law prohibiting white men from establishing residency on Cherokee land with permission from the Cherokee but without a license from the state. Worcester argued that by obeying such a law, the Cherokee had de facto surrendered their sovereignty to the state of Georgia. The missionaries established residency and began to publish a newspaper, The Cherokee Phoenix, that publicized their actions and advocated for the rights of the Cherokee as protected under federal law. Worcester brought two suits to the Supreme Court in 1830 and 1831, which established federal primacy over relations with Native American tribes and recognized the tribes as “domestic dependent nations.” However, Georgians disagreed with the decisions and saw Worcester and his fellow missionaries as revolutionaries and ordered their arrest by militia forces in 1831. While several missionaries accepted pardons, Worcester and another missionary took sentences of hard labor to put the case again before the Court. The Court again upheld the unconstitutionality of Georgia law and, in so doing, created the legal doctrine of tribal sovereignty within the United States.
Contents
- MARBURY V. MADISON
- MARTIN V. HUNTER'S LESSEE
- TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE V. WOODWARD
- McCULLOCH V. MARYLAND
- COHENS V. VIRGINIA
- GIBBONS V. OGDEN
- WORCESTER V. GEORGIA
- CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE V. WARREN BRIDGE
- UNITED STATES V. AMISTAD
- PRIGG V. PENNSYLVANIA
- DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD
- ABLEMAN V. BOOTH
- EX PARTE MILLIGAN
- SLAUGHTERHOUSE CASES
- UNITED STATES V. CRUIKSHANK
- REYNOLDS V. UNITED STATES
- CIVIL RIGHTS CASES
- ELK V. WILKINS
- PLESSY V. FERGUSON
- UNITED STATES V. WONG KIM ARK
- LOCHNER V. NEW YORK
- MULLER V. OREGON
- FRANK V. MANGUM
- GUINN V. UNITED STATES
- HAMMER V. DAGENHART
- SCHENCK V. UNITED STATES
- ABRAMS V. UNITED STATES
- WHITNEY V. CALIFORNIA
- OLMSTEAD V. UNITED STATES
- POWELL V. ALABAMA
- A.L.A. SCHECHTER POULTRY CORPORATION V. UNITED STATES
- UNITED STATES V. CURTISS-WRIGHT
- NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORPORATION
- WEST COAST HOTEL V. PARRISH
- CANTWELL V. CONNECTICUT
- WICKARD V. FILBURN
- WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION V. BARNETTE
- KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES
- SWEATT V. PAINTER
- DENNIS V. UNITED STATES
- YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE CO. V. SAWYER
- BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
- HERNANDEZ V. TEXAS
- GOMILLION V. LIGHTFOOT
- MAPP V. OHIO
- BAKER V. CARR
- ENGEL V. VITALE
- GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT
- KATZENBACH v. McCLUNG
- NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. SULLIVAN
- GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT
- BOND V. FLOYD
- MIRANDA V. ARIZONA
- SOUTH CAROLINA V. KATZENBACH
- LOVING v. VIRGINIA
- TINKER V. DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
- NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. UNITED STATES
- FLOOD V. KUHN
- FURMAN V. GEORGIA
- SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT V. RODRIGUEZ
- SIERRA CLUB V. MORTON
- ROE V. WADE
- MILLIKEN V. BRADLEY
- UNITED STATES V. NIXON
- CRAIG V. BOREN
- REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. BAKKE
- FRONTIERO v. RICHARDSON
- TEXAS V. JOHNSON
- UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ
- UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA
- CLINTON V. JONES
- BUSH V. GORE
- FRIENDS OF THE EARTH V. LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
- ZELMAN V. SIMMONS-HARRIS
- LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
- DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER
- CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
- SHELBY COUNTY V. HOLDER
- OBERGEFELL V. HODGES
- BOSTOCK V. CLAYTON COUNTY
- DOBBS V. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION