Virginia’s Act III: Baptism Does Not Exempt Slaves from Bondage
Table of Contents
Virginia’s Act III:Baptism Does Not Exempt Slaves fromBondage
Overview
Document Text

  You don't have access to this content. Please try to log in with your institution. Sign In

Abstract

In 1667 in Jamestown, Virginia, the House of Burgesses approved a statute, Act III: Baptism Does Not Exempt Slaves from Bondage, that answered the following query: Does the conferring of the Christian sacrament of baptism in any way change the legal status of a slave? The legislators ruled that baptism did not alter an enslaved person’s legal status. Their decision, when added to certain previous rulings made concerning the colony’s enslaved Blacks, revealed a distinct pattern of behavior. Virginia’s House of Burgesses slowly, over a period of years, crafted a legal system that identified enslaved Blacks and their descendants as a permanent source of cheap labor. Through that process, British colonials sowed the seeds of institutionalized slavery based on race, a system that survived in the Chesapeake region for more than two centuries.

Contents